The market for valves in the power industry will grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 2% over the next 30 years. It is predicted that this already massive market will increase further as the innovation needed to reach the net zero CO2 initiative occurs. This in turn will require coal and nuclear plants to allocate more spending to valve technologies.
By Robert McIlvaine, President & Founder – The McIlvaine Company
Valve Innovation Within Power Plants
The International Energy Agency (IEA) intends to reach global net zero CO2 emissions by 2050. To achieve this, the energy industry needs to make some serious changes, namely to the kinds of technologies used within power plants.
Already, valves are vital within the power industry, but the valve purchases for a wind or solar plant are smaller than those required for a coal plant. Since the projected capacity for wind and solar is large and the projected capacity additions for coal and nuclear plants are modest, it seems logical that the market for power plant valves would be unattractive compared to other market opportunities – but this is not the case.
Instead, this market will become incredibly attractive. This is in part because of the already extensive size of the valve market — though the need for process innovation and improved technologies will also contribute to higher valve expenditures within power plants. This is especially true for coal-based power plants.
Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is a promising future for the power industry, specifically coal processing plants. This carbon removal technique extracts bioenergy and biomass to remove carbon dioxide and greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. This technique is not only workable and valid, but also cost-effective.
The technologies necessary to provide high-capacity factor electricity for this geo-engineering technique however, requires lots of valves. Although this is true of a number of diverse power technologies, BECCS and hydrogen require more valves than other power generation options. This is illustrated on a comparison per kW, see Figure 2.
BECCS has twice the CO2 reduction impact of nuclear power as it removes CO2 from the air prior to burning and sequestration. Solar and wind have a smaller impact on a net CO2 reduction basis per GW, due to their lower capacity factors.
Valves in Hydrogen Power Technology
In a green hydrogen plant, valves are required for the purification and transport of water to the electrolyzer, a system used to separate hydrogen and oxygen atoms in H2O.
As blue hydrogen, which is derived from methane in natural gas, requires ample valves because energy is created from processes which generate CO2, carbon capture and storage (CCS) is necessary.
From the metallurgy side, manufacturers need to consider the adverse effects that hydrogen, at elevated temperatures and pressures, can have on carbon and low alloy steels; examples include hydrogen embrittlement, high temperature hydrogen attack, and hydrogen blistering.
Hydrogen is colorless, odorless, and highly explosive. It also has low viscosity, low molecular weight, and is an asphyxiant. These characteristics make zero leakage a necessity. Leakage must be addressed not only at the seat but also at all other components. Metal gaskets, which require more accurate and precise machining, can be useful when temperature requirements limit the use of soft materials. Packing design also becomes critical to avoid stem leakage. Additional inspection practices such as radiography may be necessary as well.
In addition to the previously listed detrimental effects that hydrogen can have on a valve, operating conditions such as temperature, pressure, and concentration of hydrogen need to be taken into account when selecting valve materials. It is therefore necessary to implement steps such as post‐weld heat treatment, to ensure ongoing success.
Valves in BECCS Power Technology
The use of valves in BECCS processes starts at the wood pellet. As water is used in the processes of size reduction and pelletizing of the wood and scrubbers are often used to reduce stack emissions from the pelletizing operation, valves are essential.
The wood pellets are then shipped to a power plant where they substitute for coal as the fuel. If it is a coal-fired plant, such as Drax in North Yorkshire, England, there are several types of valves essential to energy production. This includes valves used to manage the boiler feed, water intake, and cooling processes. Within BECCS power technology, valves are also used to control air and water pollution, including in the flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) systems. Additionally, carbon capture technology utilizes another set of valves for the amine absorber, which absorbs hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide to convert sour gas into sweetened gas.
Once captured, the CO2 must be transported to a permanent storage site. Currently, the most economical method for transporting large volumes of CO2 is via pipeline. To make this possible, the CO2 is converted into a high-pressure, supercritical fluid called dense phase. In this phase the CO2 behaves more like a liquid than a gas, allowing it to be pumped. Several valves are required with each pump.
One method of CO2 sequestration involves injection into geological reservoirs. The most economically viable of these is enhanced oil recovery (EOR), where CO2 is injected into active oil fields to increase production. The gas can also be injected into unusable saline aquifers and depleted oil and natural gas reservoirs. Again, valves are essential for these processes.
The Advantages of BECCS
Regardless of the method, BECCS has a number of advantages. The most obvious is that it is carbon negative. If all coalfired plants in the world were converted to BECCS global CO2 levels could be reduced. This option eliminates the tipping point worry.
The tipping point worry phenomena occurs when global temperatures exceed a critical threshold, causing advanced and irreversible environmental damage.
Another advantage is the cost. The only other carbon negative technology is Direct Air Capture. The cost of this option, however, is quite high. BECCS, on the other hand, can utilize existing coal plant steam generators and pollution control systems. The major capital cost is in the actual carbon capture and sequestration process.
The biggest advantage of BECCS is the potential use of a staged approach; the easy, slow implementation of BECCS processes in existing coal plants. The steps to implement BECCS are as follows:
Stage 1: Co-firing biomass at existing coal plants.
Stage 2: Complete conversion to biomass.
Stage 3: Partial carbon capture and sequestration or usage.
Stage 4: Full carbon capture and sequestration or usage.
The Drax power plant in the UK is already moving from stage to stage. Although they are currently at stage two, engineering and construction is underway for stage three.
This flexible approach is very desirable due to the uncertainties about CO2 impacts. The program can be accelerated if some of the more dire predictions materialize. The net zero program will result in in modest growth in the market for power plant valves over the next 30 years.
Pump Engineer uses Functional, Analytical and Tracking cookies
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.